4 Nov. – first shot across the bow from Industri union

2020 negotiations begin, for painters and others
pic: måleriföretagen.se

Let the negotiations begin. The Industry Union (Industrifacket) came out today with a demand for a 3% salary increase on a one year contract on behalf of their union members. The response? “Where has the union been this fall?” wondered Peter Hidesten, executive director for Industry Employers, and pointed to the economic downturn underway in the steel and forest industries (DN.se/avtal).

The bid was the opening shot in the yearly negotiation process (avtalsrörelse) between employers and employees across the country. Industrifacket negotiates for 400,000 Swedish workers, a conglomeration of several different workers’ associations – IF Metall, GS, Livs, Unionen and Sveriges Ingenjörs – textile workers’ union, factory workers’ union, forest workers’ union, food industry workers’ union, “unionen” the white collar trade union workers and Sweden’s Engineers.

Peter Hidesten called the bid “completely unrealistic” considering the economic situation. “Instead, he added, it’s time to shift down on salary increases.” However, Marie Nilsson, chair of the metal workers’ union IF Metall, disagreed: “We believe that the raise corresponds well with a responsible salary increase. We’ve contributed to the strengthening industry’s competitiveness over the past few years, so it should be manageable.”

Industrifacket is the first out in the larger negotiation process that is fairly unique to Sweden. The yearly negotiations between employers and worker representatives has been key in preventing massive labor unrest for decades. Traditionally, what Industrifacket gets from the employers’ organization sets the number, or mark (industrimärket), for what other unions can negotiate for. This year, however, the Kommunal union decided not to be a part of Industrifacket’s bargaining, and will handle their own negotiations.

Kommunal, the Swedish Municipal Workers’ Union, speaks for over 500,000 employees at all levels – teachers, nurses, care workers, county administrative workers and more. They chose to not join the Industrifacket side of the table because Industri wouldn’t go along with asking for a higher salary increase for Kommunal members who work in the health, care, and school sectors.

Splitting the employee side of the negotiation force shocked a lot of people, and many thought Kommunal splitting off significantly weakened the employee-side’s bargaining position. Chairperson for Kommunal, Tobias Baudin, stated that he thought they’d do well by negotiating for themselves. “We’re big, strong, and pretty pissed off (Aftonbladet.se/avtal). Also the paper industry workers’ union Pappers, with 13,500 members, pulled out from the employee side, believing that they, too, would be better off negotiating for themselves.

In total, about 2.8 million workers are affected by negotiations that make up the 2020 bargaining period (ekonomifakta.se/avtal). The real negotiations begin soon after the new year.

3 Nov. – busy bomb squads

like nowhere else
pic: thelocal.se

It’s difficult to get a good sense of the numbers of explosions that have occurred in Sweden over the past year. In August, SVT reported that there were 120 explosions to which the bomb squad was sent out between January and July of this year. After the three latest bombs in Malmö this weekend, DN is reporting 102 explosions where the bomb squad was sent in so far this year.

The one sure thing in all these numbers is that no other country in Europe has these kind of statistics. In fact, DN reports, experts are coming to Sweden to take a closer look at this development for themselves, and to think about how they can keep it from happening where they come from.

So far, there have not been large number of deaths and injuries from detonations, but there are concerns that as the bombs become more advanced and able to be set off from far away, via a mobile, for example, the number of casualties will rise. “Previously, these cases dealt with hand grenades, and there could be witnesses” said criminologist Amir Rostami to DN. “But now, when one can plant a bomb and set if off from a distance, it gets more complicated.” Very few of these crimes are solved – in many cases, material that could be used to identify the criminal parties is simply blown up.

It’s not just anybody doing this, but anybody can be hit” said one man to DN in regards to the bomb in Almgården early on Saturday. “I was sleeping with my kids, 11 and 4 years old, when the bomb went off. We all jumped up in our beds and for the rest of the night it was impossible to calm down.”

Police in the South Region have created a committee to examine the issue and to see how to infiltrate the groupings of people behind the bombings (sprängningskommission). Meanwhile, Veronica Truedsson and her family are pulling up stakes and leaving Malmö. “We’re scared to death of the escalating violence here” (DN.se/leavingMalmo).

2 Nov. – Left party wording raises questions

Left party grapples with honor violence
pic: futureswithoutviolence.org

The Left party began its congress this past Friday in Göteborg. Although the final decision on the wording of the party platform won’t be taken until May, suggestions for changes have been circulating in Left party circles for a while. One of the suggested changes has met with a lot of critique, also from Jonas Sjöstedt, the Left party’s leader.

In the platform suggestion in question, neither “honor based violence” (hedersvåld) nor “honor based oppression” (hedersförtryck) are mentioned. Instead, the issue is tucked into the larger section with the title Gender Power Hierarchy (könsmaktsordning) where it states “Disparagement takes different forms, and its legitimization can be more or less hidden by everything from the exercise of authority and honor-related concepts to social norms” (SvD.se/honor). The term “honor-related concepts” is a pretty heavily watered down variation on honor-based violence and oppression, people are saying.

The Left party has been accused of being soft on honor-based violence before. In August, representative Amineh Kakabaveh was forced out of (or stepped down from, depending on how you see it) the Left party. According to her, her party made it impossible for her to remain a representative by ignoring her at meetings: It was punishment for speaking out too strongly on women’s behalf, and for criticizing the party for not doing nearly enough to support women (see this post).

Similar critique is now being aimed at the party, and this time from another long-term party member, Jonas Lundgren. The phrase honor-related concepts “relativizes” honor based violence, he says. “It’s like trying to prettify the control and oppression that many suffer in honor’s name” (SvD.se/honor). “We have a feminist platform that declares that these questions are big and important. And yet, dammit, (lik förbannat) there have been people in central positions in the party that have questioned that analysis, wondering if it isn’t an instance of racism” (DN.se/honor).

“This was a mistake in the program” said Jonas Sjöstedt. “It’s likely that there will be rewrites, and the words honor-related concepts will be changed” said Hanna Cederin, the party program committee’s convener (DN.se/honor).

That sounds like an excellent idea.

(